I a richards four kinds of meaning pdf

Among the moderns he is the only critic who has formulated a systematic and complete theory of the literary art. In the words of George Watson,. He provided the theoretical foundations on which the technique of verbal analysis was built. He and T. Eliot are pioneers in the field of new criticism. Richards is often compared with Coleridge. Like Coleridge he is am of wide learning.

He is widely read not only in literature, but also in philosophy, psychology, aesthetic , the fine arts and the broad principles of the various sciences. The relevance of psychology to literary studies emerges clearly in his first book, The Foundations of Aesthetics , written in collaboration with his two friends.

In this book the authors have tried to define 'beauty' by studying its effects on the readers. His second book, The Meaning of Meaning was written with Ogden; it distinguished between the symbolic use of language in science and its emotive use in poetry. In The Principles of Literary Criticism , Richards alone explains his psychological theory of value and explores the emotive language of poetry.

The work is a landmark in the history of literary criticism and even since verbal and textual analysis, interpretation and evaluation of the basis of literary appreciation. Therefore I.

Richards and T. Eliot are called the founding father of New Criticism. A study of Richards's a staunch advocate of a close textual Practical Criticism; A Study of Literary Judgment reveals that Richards is a staunch advocate of a close textual and verbal study and analysis of a work of art.

Similar interest in the study of words is revealed in his book, Meaning of Meaning. Total meaning of a poem is combination of several contributory meanings of four different types—. Sense, 2. Feeling, 3. Tone, and 4. Sense means plain literal meaning. Words which communicate something which gives plain literary menacing without communication any hidden or under layer meaning.

Feeling refers to emotions emotional attitudes, will, desire, pleasure, unpleasure, and the rest. The write chooses his words and arranges them keeping in mind the kind of readers likely to read his work. There is a relation between the writer and his reader and the tone reflects the awareness of this relation. Log in to reply. Leave a Reply Cancel reply You must be logged in to post a comment. Loading Comments The majority were undergraduates reading English richard a view to an Honours Degree.

But there are some who refuse to let a little differ- ence like this come between them and the poet. Not too often is the adage so beautifully illustrated. But the wrist and thumb idea is dropped care- lessly, i a richards four kinds of meaning the sense is never obscure. Pm sure this is a good sonnet, but it takes a lot of getting at. But another falsification may perhaps be charged against me, falsification through bias in selection.

The poet has expressed in vivid terms his conception of the higher, if not the highest plane i a richards four kinds of meaning life and we who read his work, cannot fail to appreciate its nobility of thought 2 and w its challenge to mankind.

Everything turns upon how the principles are applied. But I hope, not only to present an instructive collection of con- temporary opinions, presuppositions, theories, beliefs, responses and the rest, but also to make some suggestions towards a better control of these tricksy components of our oof. The gulf fourr wide be- tween a reader who naturally and immediately perceives this form i a richards four kinds of meaning movement by a con- junction of sensory, intellectual and emotional sagacity and another reader, who either ignores it or has to build it up laboriously with finger- counting, table-tapping and the rest ; and this difference has most far-reaching effects.

Stock responses and metre, Later, he became the director of kindw Orthological Institute of China. Jokes and illustrations are admissible. A means of expression feelings about situation. It is not confined to one class of readers ; not only those whom we would suspect fall victims.